Quote:
Originally Posted by windows
tmn0004676: TV Out I never think to use as I've only had it on the Xda Serra and had little use for it then. The front facing camera, yes I've had it in phones I've used over the last three years but as there is not a lot of 3G around here I've never had a video call so don't miss it. Therefore those elements do not occur to me, so you could say I missed them or did not take them into account but I do not consider them 'killer' features to omit.
Colour balance: from what I can recall when taking the shots the camera did tend to focus on the sky and maybe a sit was a bright sky but the rest was pretty much in shadow that caused the effect?
So which way should one adjust the white balance to compensate?
It might be worth mentioning that the Saturation / Contrast / Sharpness are all set to +3 as a default, could this also have an effect? Metering mode is set to spot unfortunately which probably does not help?
|
the easiest example to see for white balance is to take a picture under flourescent light. an auto white balance even on higher end consumer (non-dslr) cameras often misinterprets the light and it turns a horrible purple-ish or green-ish tinge.
the white balance effects between sunny, cloudy, and shade are more subtle, but the in-camera lightmeter doesn't always guess right. that's where being able to manually change the white balance can be valuable. so the settings to choose from are usually that - sunny, cloudy, shade, flourescent, incandescent.
RAW format makes this much more flexible since it saves the actual image as captured by the camera rather than with the default generic image processing that then converts the RAW image to jpg format.
The ExpoDisc (
http://www.expoimaging.net/) is designed for exact white balance matches, mostly used by dSLR pros. it could be just as easily used over any consumer-level camera as well. then you could use image processing software such as Lightroom to get the correct white balance reading from a picture taken with the ExpoDisc covering the lens and then apply it to the rest of your photos from that location/time. I already have the ExpoDisc for my dSLR, so it would be an easy thing for me to do. Otherwise it's an investment of time and money for the ExpoDisc and software, and it's undoubtedly the best thing I've done with my dSLR to improve my camera results.
The default saturation settings sound off to me, maybe a mistake in the defaults. I'd zero-out all the settings and then adjust if needed.
Spot metering mode is a great thing for people/animals, but more tricky for landscapes. Spot means that the exposure reading is taken from the focus point of the camera. if the spot reads a dark area, it brightens the whole photo to compensate, and vice versa. That's probably why there's no detail in the sky in that photo. If you use the on-camera review you'll be able to tell at capture time. Not to mention that the review screen is bigger/better than ANY camera on the market today!
While I hope for a decent phone camera since it's so convenient to always have with me, I recognize that it might not provide the same results as a dedicated camera. If the HD2 has a short shutter lag, then I'm impressed just with that. My wife uses a top-consumer-tier Canon G9 and it still has quite a bit of lag.
5 Megapixels is plenty for most needs - generally speaking the more megapixels the lower the image quality. Consider that for prints 3 megapixels is enough for a 4x6 unless you crop a lot. 5 megapixels gives enough breathing room for cropping, and still offers a good performance/storage balance. I would *hate* it if the HD2 had more megapixels - it's just not practical. My wife's G9 has 12 megapixels - a complete waste of storage space, and is an absolute pain to try to share pictures by email or uploading. I'd rather 5 megapixels any day.
For my use, the HD2 camera would be used most often to take reference photos - like something to remember while shopping, or like a quick and easy document scan in close-up mode. If it performs well with that I'm happy. If it actually takes pictures of my kids in focus, without shutter lag, and without motion blur -- I would be happily take that too.